After taking some time off - a period that included my birthday - I’m ready to get back into the battle for the heart of our nation. I hope you will see a renewed spirit and enthusiasm in my writing, mixed with truth and sarcasm.
For today’s blog, I simply couldn’t add anything to this video. It’s a great bit of satire that I’m sure will make you laugh.
If you’re tired of Obama’s B.S., here’s a product that you can’t live without.
In a speech to Justice Department employees marking Black History Month last year, Eric Holder made the following declaration about America concerning the issue of race:
“Though this nation has proudly thought of itself as an ethnic melting pot, in things racial we have always been and I believe continue to be, in too many ways, essentially a nation of cowards.”
While he took alot of heat for that declaration, time has shown these words to ring true. And nowhere is it more true than in Holder’s very own Department of Justice.
It began with his decision to drop charges against members of the New Black Panther Party for interfering with voters in a Philadelphia precinct during the 2008 elections using voter intimidation tactics - which included carrying a club and being dressed in military-looking clothes – even though they already had a conviction in the case.
We have now learned that the “gentlemen” in the video are a part of an ultra-extreme group who advocate the death of whites as a part of some sort of racial healing.
Now Holder’s speech makes sense and proves that he was right. Here’s how:
Race, Holder said, “is an issue we have never been at ease with and, given our nation’s history, this is in some ways understandable. If we are to make progress in this area, we must feel comfortable enough with one another and tolerant enough of each other to have frank conversations about the racial matters that continue to divide us.”
Isn’t that what King Samir Shabazz is doing in the video? Sounds to me like he’s pretty frank about “the racial matters that continue to divide,” doesn’t it to you?
“Saturdays and Sundays, America in the year 2009 does not in some ways differ significantly from the country that existed almost 50 years ago. This is truly sad,” said Holder.
Doesn’t the racial hatred being spewed by Shabazz sound just like the 1960′s?
Recently, a now former DOJ Civil Rights attorney has gone public with the information that Holder’s office made the decision to drop the charges of voter intimidation against the New Black Panthers, not because they were innocent, but because the DOJ has “little interest in bringing cases against black defendants” and “doesn’t want to protect white voters.”
Going back to Holder’s comments about being a coward, isn’t that exactly how you would describe a man who plays the race card when it’s convenient and hides behind his office?
So to my fellow conservatives, I want to set the record straight. When it comes to racial matters in America, Eric Holder got it right.
In his Rice University speech, John F. Kennedy challenged America to put a man on the moon and in the process, inspired a generation to take pride in American exceptionalism and lead the world in space exploration.
William Bradford, speaking in 1630 of the founding of the Plymouth Bay Colony, said that all great and honorable actions are accompanied with great difficulties, and both must be enterprised and overcome with answerable courage.
If this capsule history of our progress teaches us anything, it is that man, in his quest for knowledge and progress, is determined and cannot be deterred. The exploration of space will go ahead, whether we join in it or not…
We mean to be a part of it–we mean to lead it. For the eyes of the world now look into space, to the moon and to the planets beyond…
In short, our leadership in science and in industry, our hopes for peace and security, our obligations to ourselves as well as others, all require us to make this effort, to solve these mysteries, to solve them for the good of all men, and to become the world’s leading space-faring nation.
We choose to go to the moon. We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win…
With these words, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) was formed to see this great calling come to pass.
Unfortunately, American exceptionalism is something our current President doesn’t believe in, but he does believe in the need to pacify Muslim extremists around the world and he has found a way to mix these two into one, great big, policy.
Gee, Kennedy sure was a dope, wasn’t he? And apparently, confused too.
Didn’t he realize that America could never succeed in space without the help of nations who appear to be in need of some positive affirmation?
Wasn’t he aware that American superiority in space would lower the self-esteem of Muslims around the world?
Didn’t he know that the math and science knowledge we would need couldn’t be found at Rice, but rather in places like the Iran and Iraq?
Shouldn’t he have given his speech in a place like Cairo instead of Rice?
In light of Barry’s new policies, we can now see why he has coddled Iran. He’s probably planning to use their nuclear missile technology as a part of our mission to Mars. If Israel gets annihilated in the process, who cares? At least their self-esteem will be intact.
And, in the spirit of the new mission for America’s space program, the administration has announced a new name meant to better communicate the intentions of agency:
MASA – The Muslim Affirmation and Self-esteem Agency
Barry hates winning and American exceptionalism, so his approach to dealing with NASA should come as no surprise. It allows him to spend money that would have gone to the space agency on his endless wealth-redistribution programs, all-the-while he reaches out to the Muslim nations that he has much more in common with than he will admit.
Government is not the solution to the problem, government is the problem. – Ronald Reagan
It’s no mystery that government spending is out of control.
It’s no mystery that government is too big.
And it’s no mystery that America will fail if this continues, which is the motivation behind a new movie coming out this fall.
Two versions of the American dream now stand in sharp contrast. One views the money you earned as yours and best allocated by you. It champions the traditional American dream, which has played out millions of times through generations of Americans, of improving one’s lot in life and the entrepreneurial spirit of daring to dream and to build big.
The other believes that the federal government, using taxpayers’ money, should play a major role in leveling out the nation’s wealth to guarantee outcomes to all, regardless of effort.
How America chooses between these two views of the role of government, at this crucial juncture, will have everything to do with the future we and our children and our children’s children will enjoy.
In light of House Democrat Majority Leader Steny Hoyer’s announcment this morning that the ruling majority will not pass a budget resolution this year, the time is now for us to take action.
Progressives on Capitol Hill aren’t interested in spending less. In fact, since they are only planning a temporary extension of the Bush tax cuts (just until the end of the year), they obviously plan to tax the daylights out of America after the November elections.
“As the House and Senate debate what to do with the expiring Bush tax cuts in the coming weeks, we need to have a serious discussion about their implications for our fiscal outlook, including whether we can afford to permanently extend them before we have a real plan for long-term deficit reduction,”said Hoyer, a Maryland Democrat.
“Raising revenue is part of the deficit solution, too.”
If you agree with me that the tax and spend policies of Obama and his Progressive buddies in Congress are destroying the free enterprise, capitalistic system that has made America the greatest country in the history of the world, then I invite you to be a part of this project by signing the Debt Free America petition.
Let us be sure that those who come after will say of us in our time, that in our time we did everything that could be done. We finished the race; we kept them free; we kept the faith. - Ronald Reagan
In a startling admission today, an unnamed source within the Obama administration admitted that the speech the messiah gave last night from the Oval Office wasn’t the one he planned on giving – in fact, it wasn’t even his own.
“We were just a few minutes from going on the air, when the original speech disappeared. As we scoured the Oval Office, we came across an old speech given by Jimmy Carter that was almost exactly like the one the President was going to give,” said the source.
“After adding a few lines about the oil spill, along with some self-aggrandizing talk about how the President has everything under control, we loaded it into the teleprompter and went with it.”
When asked why they didn’t just let Obama “wing it,” the source laughed and deferred to another question. Then the source was asked about the similarities between the two speeches. The following list was provided:
Carter referred to his oil crisis as a “battlefield” – Obama referred to his as a “battle.”
Carter used his crisis as a call to develop alternative energy – Obama is using his for the same thing.
Carter promised to “seize control of our common destiny” – Obama promised to “seize control of our own destiny.”
Carter demanded a tax on oil companies to pay for alternative energy – Obama demanded new taxes in the form of Cap and Trade
Carter created an Energy Mobilization Board – Obama created a National Commission
Carter invoked WWII to reinforce his “war” on oil – Obama invoked WWII for the same reason
Carter demanded Congress act immediately – Obama demanded Congress act immediately
Carter blamed Congress and Washington insiders for his problems – Obama has been blaming others since the day he was sworn in
Carter used God to close his speech – Obama used God to close his speech
But the similarities didn’t end with just the words of their speeches, there were other similarities as well:
Carter used the Oval Office for his speech to look Presidential – Barry did it for the same reason
Carter used the oil crisis to cover up his foreign policy weaknesses – So did Obama
Carter used an imaginary oil shortage for political advantage – Obama is creating an oil shortage with his 6-month moratorium for the same reason
Upon reviewing both speeches, it’s clear that the Administration had no choice but to admit that they weren’t using original material last night. I guess it was a good thing for the President that they found a speech from a President that is so similar to Obama.
On the otherhand, I guess it was a sad thing for America that they found a speech from a President that is so similar to Obama.
